I started
working at Millennium Park as a custodian during my high school summer breaks
and went back every summer for four years. The job was fairly easy besides
short spurts of hard work, the job paid two dollars over minimum wage and you
got to enjoy the scenery. Everything ran smoothly besides certain days of the
week were we would work with the park manager Sal. We had four park managers,
working with three out of the four was doable, but Sal was short tempered,
impatient with little compassion for his workers.
The main problems
that came about with working with Sal was that workers would get nervous whenever
he was on shift, not only that but his work request were at times unreasonable
or illogical. He would continuously yell at people to work faster or to do a
better job, which was contradictory because if he wanted work done quickly that
would mean giving up the quality of the work, and if he wanted quality that
would mean giving up time. Also, some of his work requests were silly to say
the least. For example, when I was still in high school I would work every
weekend and in the winter I had to remove snow from a bridge that leads to the
neighbor park. In retrospect, one would imagine the job to be fairly simple,
pick up the snow with the shovel and toss it to the sides of the bridge, except
that Sal had other thoughts. He wanted me to pick up the snow with the shovel,
put it in a rolling garbage can, roll it to the bottom and then toss the snow
on the sides of the bridge. Thinking it was silly I ignored his request at
first and did it my way but he became furious once he found out and made me do
it his way.
My
perspective of the situation was that his requests were silly and illogical,
and most of the other workers thought the same things. The job could have been
done faster and more efficiently had I been able to just toss the snow to the
side of the bridge. On the other hand, Sal’s perspectives were probably
different. Maybe he did know that his method was inefficient but perhaps he was
trying to get a point across; maybe he wanted to impose his authority on me to
show that it was his way, or the highway, a line his had said multiple times to
some of the other employees. Another theory to why Sal might apply that managerial
method is that he believed that his workers were uneducated and he knew best. But
a problem that arose from Sal’s managerial style is that workers felt
uncomfortable working with him and worked inefficient most of the time. And as
said in B&D, the relationship between the workers and the managers
determines how effective they are at work.
People
would not act to the problems that Sal brought to the working environment. The
workers were too scared to express their opinions and if they did they would be
punished by doing harder work of if the worker was seasonal they would get
fired. People’s fears of Sal were so real that people would work their schedule
around Sal’s shift, sometimes even giving up work days to avoid working with
him. The conflict with Sal never got resolved, and in his anger tantrums
escalated so high that he yelled at the wrong person one day. He began harassing
a girl that worked at the bar located in the park because she had used park
resources that she was not allowed to use; he said degrading things to her and got
to her so bad that she went home in tears. What came into effect from that was that
the girl’s boyfriend showed up to Sal’s house (no idea how he knew were he
lived) and began beating on Sal so bad that he was sent to the hospital with
internal bleeding.
All those problems
could have been solved had everyone acted differently. Sal could have avoided that
eventual beating had he known how to show respect to his workers rather than
being degrading. The workers could have acted differently as well by informing
Sal’s higher ups about Sal’s actions since he would not listen to anyone below
him. As said in B&D, communication is vital, Sal should communicate with
his employees in respectful manner to get his point across, and employees
should use their rights to report Sal’s improper behavior rather than just
taking his harassment.
This is a good story and sounds like a real example of conflict. The way you tell it, Sal was a bad apple. The question I have for you is did the other managers know this about Sal? And if those four managers had a boss, did that boss know.
ReplyDeleteYou may not know the answers to that question. So let me ask a different, but related question. Did you or any of your other co-workers who had a bad experience with Sal complain to the other managers, making sure in the process that if they confronted Sal they wouldn't identify you in particular?
Sometimes there are belligerent managers who are that way for reasons unrelated to work. If a person has personal issues outside of work, that person needs help. It is the person's boss who has the responsibility to identify that and suggest a remedy. It is next to impossible for those who report to the manager to find a solution.
Attention about Sal’s behavior was brought to the other managers, but they usually brushed it off. Two of the other three managers did share some dislike towards Sal since they had conflict with him in their own workspace before hand. The problem with proving Sal’s behavior was that all the managers worked different times, besides sharing workspace for a couple of hours on Wednesdays. Also, Sal had the most seniority out all the managers and perhaps they too were scared of getting fired.
ReplyDeleteNow attention was never really brought to Sal’s manager due to a couple of reasons. Sal usually mistreated individuals who spoke very little English, and those individuals were usually too timid to approach Sal’s boss. Also, most people had little education and probably didn’t know their full rights. Sal did stay away from those who belong to a union, which proves how he would pick and choose who to bother.