The article was quite
interesting and it is surprising how children so young were able to somehow
analyze when to share and when to be greedy. Though I did not expect such an
analysis by children on the events, it could be reasoned that one would be more
willing to split the gains when work is divided up evenly, to keep the gains
when one comes up lucky and to keep all the gains when on did his own work even
if both challenges were the same. Events that occur day to day can be compared
to the experiment with similar outcomes. For example, lets say Tim and Jim are
to friends walking down the road and Tim sees a twenty dollar bill on the floor
and picks it up, what are the odds that Time will go out of his way to split
the twenty in two tens to share with Jim? Slim to none. On the other hand lets
say Tim and Jim want to make some cash and decide to mow their neighbor’s lawn
for fifty dollars. They do an even amount of work and decide to split the fifty
to twenty-five/ twenty-five. The reason I’m making these scenarios up because I
believe that the “share the spoils” button is activated by a sense of fairness
or perhaps a sense of security. What I mean by a sense of security is that
someone will be more willing to help you out if you help them out, especially
if both are facing the same troubles.
When I
was younger, roughly from ten till like seventeen, I would go to my home
country every summer. My grandparents would house and feed me every summer but
I would feel bad asking for spending money, so two of my cousins and msyself
came up with an idea to make some money. An uncle of ours owns a Torta
restaurant in our village, and we offered him to sell the tortas around town in
an ice box (tortas are similar to sandwiches in that both contain a bread but
the ingredients that go within the torta are similar to those in tacos). Our
uncle was happy to help, and he even said we could keep the whole profits of
out sales as long as we helped clean the restaurant after closing time.
On our
first day working for our uncle, my two cousins and myself met up at the
restaurant to discuss what route we would take.
We figured that we would all start in what would be the downtown of our
village, split up, and then meet back at the restaurant. Once we came up with
our game plan we filled up our iceboxs with tortas and went on our way.
I made
quick progress with my sales in the downtown of our town since it was the most
densely populated area and I decided to continue with my sales at other
locations that would have a large population of people. I sold at parks, went
to the waiting rooms of the clinics and to local businesses. By the end of the
usual dinner time (5 o’clock), I had sold all of my tortas. I headed back to
the restaurant to meet with my cousins but I only found one. We decided to wait
for our other cousin but it took him about an extra hour to finally meet up
with us and he still had some of the tortas claiming he was unable to sell
them.
What had
happened was that one of my cousins and myself had a similar strategy of
selling at densely populated areas, while my other cousin decided to take a
more isolated route simply because he knew it better. At the end of the day,
the cousin that took the densely populated route and myself had made more money
than the other cousin. Though we took different routes, the both of us who had
made more money believed that we had put in the same amount of work, especially
since our other cousin walked around for and extra hour, so we concluded that
it would be fair to divide up our profits evenly, giving my “poorer” cousin a
gift.
Though our
conclusion seemed noble, I thought ahead and considered my income risk for the
future. For all I knew, both my cousins could make more profit than me next
time around, so it would behoove me to share some of my gains from today to
achieve some security in the future.
I think my
experience with team production and gift exchange correlates with the piece.
For example, the three of us thought we put in about the same amount of work,
since cleaning up the restaurant was also part of the deal, so we thought it
would be fair to divide up the profits evenly just like the children who had to
work together to get marbles divided up their profits. To be honest, the
outcome would have probably been different if we felt we had done more work
than our “poorer” cousin. For example, if we had found out that he decided to
take a break, explaining his extra hour or work, we would have decided to keep
our own profits. The same can be said if we got lucky and a customer decided to
tip us or if we had found some money on the floor, I highly doubt that would
have been shared.
I didn't completely understand this story as you set it up. Was selling the tortas a one-shot thing? Or did you do it repeatedly, although you wrote about only the first time doing it? Also, on the spending of the earnings, did you hang out with your cousins or were each of you by yourself?
ReplyDeleteIf the activity was repeated then the reason to share the first time through is to offer support for the cousin who didn't sell all the tortas to do better the next time. If you all hung out together in spending the money, then the reason to share would be to make that time more pleasurable when you were enjoying the fruits of your labor.
One other aspect of the story is worth commenting on. Did the cousin who didn't sell the tortas feel he had made a mistake after the fact? Or was he adamant that he had done the right thing and simply got unlucky? There is a tendency to want to reward somebody who has tried, even if they make an error, but not to reward somebody who is blind to doing things in a more productive way. So that might have mattered too.
Finally, I'm curious about the price. Who set that? Your uncle? or you? Was the same exact item sold at the restaurant? If so, was your selling somehow also serving as advertising for your uncle's place. If so, maybe what your cousin did had more value to your uncle even though he didn't sell all the tortas. Since your uncle let you keep all the sales revenue, perhaps you also had your uncle's perspective in mind when considering sharing with the other course.
ReplyDeleteSorry for not clarifying a couple of things. It was actually not a one-time thing, my cousins and myself sold the tortas for a good portion of the summer. The earnings were just for me; my cousins used their profits to their discretion. The reason why I was working was so I could have spending money for whenever I hung out with friends of family.
My own reason for giving my cousin support was sort of greedy. I offered support to reduce my own income risk in the future, in hopes that if I was ever the cousin who came up short I would have support too.
My uncle, according to how he sold the tortas at his restaurant, set the price. The tortas were the same product but they were usually the left overs from the day before, probably the reason why he offered us full profit. The cousin that made the least profit made a mistake by taking the route with less people as he failed to realize that we could sell more and quicker at crowded locations. So in that respect you can say that we gave him support to reward his efforts. Knowing what to do, our “poor cousin” fixed his mistakes and his profits grew.
I never thought of that, but I could have possibly been an advertising method for my uncle, somewhat what jimmy johns does at football games.